I have 2 avenues I can go down with the missions:
1-All realistic actually happened events
2-Real events then slowly leading into fictional disastrous missions
what do we think?
How about option 2 but with a twist, if you respond well to the event it follows track 1, closer to the actual outcome, but the more time you take to respond to the incident, the more towards disastrous it goes.
Ex. If you were to put a plane crash in the river as a mission, if you are able to respond quickly and get everyone off the plane and out of the water, you have no casualities, you just have to rescue them, but the longer it takes the more casualities and fatalities you have, and if you dont rescue all victims before a certain time the plane would sink, causing more casualities and rescues from the plane.