218 replies to this topic

[LACityFFengineCo287]

When I was helping someone, I believe I gave someone in this forum my email over a p.m, nice job trying to hack me, you failed miserably. Now you will fall into my wrath when I find you ^^

[Hoppah]

If you can prove he tried to hack you, please contact me or Stan by PM and give us the username. We will track his IP and contact his ISP (we have done that before), because hacking is punishable by law and not tolerated on this forum.

[joachimnor]

it is actually an international crime, just like shooting civillians in a war

[Fuzzyface]

What gets me is quitters on XBL.

Laughably, I was winning a game on fifa 10 3-0, and as the guy quit i sent a message saying "I'm sorry" and offering a hug.

He came back with, 'i was battering you'.

People's logic confuses me sometimes

[nick the greek]

it is actually an international crime, just like shooting civillians in a war

Let me guess. Response to US marines or Blackwater's killers?

[joachimnor]

response to the so called "war" against terror but back to topic

[Hoppah]

just like shooting civillians in a war

Nice comparison, seems like you know exactly what you're talking about.

[joachimnor]

hahahaha, geneva convention xP

[nick the greek]

response to the so called "war" against terror but back to topic

Last off topic message. The so called "war against terror" is a war being made in the name of money and stupidity.

[Forensics]

It's a bit of a oxymoron "war against terror".

[Stan]

I smell a discussion starting...

[joachimnor]

The war against terror is not a legal war and can by that not be called a war...

[Ami89E1234]

yet 43 odd countries support and continue it

guess mankind is just as retarded as usual

[Newfoundking]

Well here's the thing, if you are a big country with lots of guns, and you have 42 others doing the same as you, it doesn't matter if others approve, because you can blow them up

[usmc123]

The war against terror is not a legal war and can by that not be called a war...

So what is legal? Mass murdering Kurds? Hitting a building with two jumbo jets? Running a government in Afghanistan that is completely tyrannical? Your so right, we should of just watched the world destroy itself.

[erfd]

So what is legal? Mass murdering Kurds? Hitting a building with two jumbo jets? Running a government in Afghanistan that is completely tyrannical? Your so right, we should of just watched the world destroy itself.

I know right, and since our president is sending 30 thousand troops over and saying when they will leave, its just telling the terrorist to lay low and wait a few years to attack AGAIN.

[usmc123]

I know right, and since our president is sending 30 thousand troops over and saying when they will leave, its just telling the terrorist to lay low and wait a few years to attack AGAIN.

We are not going to be out of Afghanistan by 2011, unless support for the war hits an all time low and Obama starts getting nervous about re-election. We are going to be there probably until 2013 with a significant troop presence. However, I'm worried about how the media and the Dems will feel, this war will be tough. The Taliban are not 18 year olds from Syria and Saudi Arabia looking to plant some bombs on roads. They are fighters with experience fighting the dominant fighting force, but we are a military that knows how to fight an army that fights face to face instead of via a cell phone on an IED frequency.

[Xplorer4x4]

yet 43 odd countries support and continue it

guess mankind is just as retarded as usual

So just because mass majority does something, its right?

[Fuzzyface]

Xplorer, I don't think Ami89 was suggesting it was right (given the word 'retarded')
...

Ultimately, I don't ever see there being an end to this. It's almost a counter productive loop.
Yes, the initial goal was to find Bin Laden, then out of nowhere Iraq are thrown into the light via a voted for law, stating they had to let inspectors in or face consequences.

They let inspectors in, who found nothing and realised they dropped a b*****k, so suddenly a change in leaders becomes the forefront reason (something that G.W Bush inherited as a POLICY when he took over)

Now I am in no way, supportive of

Spoiler

the taliban

etc, but they DO have a point in that it is not the 'United Forces' land to currently be sat on.

They did what they wanted by overthrowing Saddam, so we should have all got the hell out of there after.

Unfortunately, the longer we stay, and the more of them we kill, the more of them get hired to 'force out' the 'opressor'.

Everything is already corrupted there already, for example the Police officer in 'training' out there who shot the british troops as they had lunch with an ak47.

We should just pull everyone out, no care for face saving now when there's no face left, it's peoples lives at risk.

If Obama, Brown, Sarkozy(sp?) and everyone else want a presence in the Eastern Countries, they should go there themselves.

[Xplorer4x4]

Xplorer, I don't think Ami89 was suggesting it was right (given the word 'retarded)

Perhaps, some times its hard to tell with text on a screen.